Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42347862›Full record

ArticleFood science of animal resources2026

Analyses of the microbial safety and physicochemical characteristics of beef loin treated with high-pressure.

Ui-Bin Baek, Hack-Youn Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science of animal resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ui-Bin BaekKongju National University, Yesan, Republic of Korea.
Hack-Youn KimKongju National University, Yesan, Republic of Korea. kimhy@konju.ac.kr.

Funding

Rural Development Administration RS-2023-00231378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of high-pressure processing (HPP) on microbial safety and physicochemical quality of raw beef intended for use in raw pet food, with particular emphasis on microbial inactivation and physicochemical characteristics changes during refrigerated storage. Beef samples were treated at pressures of 0.1, 100, 300, and 500 MPa for 5-15 min and stored at refrigerated conditions for up to 2 weeks. Microvial populations, including Salmonella Typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Bacillus cereus, were enumerated during storage. Physicochemical properties, including proximate composition, pH, color, water-holding capacity, shear force, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and volatile basic nitrogen (VBN), were also analyzed. Microbial counts decreased with increasing pressure and holding time. The 500 MPa for 15 min treatment reduced S. Typhimurium to below the detection limit (< 1 log CFU/g) throughout storage, while other pathogens showed substantial reductions with limited regrowth. HPP did not affect proximate composition of pH; however, higher pressures increased lightness, yellowness, shear force, WHC, and TBARS, while redness decreased. VBN levels decreased with increasing pressure but increased during storage. HPP effectively enhanced microbial safety of raw beef while inducing pressure and time-dependent physicochemical changes associated with muscle protein denaturation, myoglobin oxidation, and enzyme inactivation. These results support HPP as a promising intervention for improving the safety of raw pet food, although quality changes should be considered in process optimization.

Indexed as

Foodborne pathogensHigh-pressureMicrobial safetyNon-thermal sterilizationPhysicochemical characteristicsRaw pet food

Identifiers

PMID42347862
PMCPMC13305074

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.