SynthesisPsychological research2026
Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on face identification and related perceptual processes: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Face identification is a core capacity underpinning effective social interaction and communication. Although a growing body of literature has examined the effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) on face identification, findings remain fragmented and lack an integrative synthesis. This systematic review adopted a broad scope, encompassing all published studies on TES and face identification, with the aim of mapping methodological trends and substantive findings, rather than focusing on a specific subtype of intervention or population. We conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review of TES effects on face identification. From an initial pool of 261 records, 28 studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, the evidence highlights both the potential and the complexity of using TES to modulate face identification processing. Targeted stimulation of occipital and fusiform regions shows promising effects in some paradigms; however, inconsistent results and notable methodological limitations preclude definitive conclusions. In particular, small, demographically homogeneous samples limit generalizability, while heterogeneity in stimulation parameters, task designs, and outcome measures complicate cross-study comparisons. By underscoring the need for rigorously controlled experiments with greater anatomical precision, especially in clinical populations, this review aims to inform the development of more robust, transparent methodological guidelines and to support future investigations with stronger scientific relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.