ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026
Delta radiomics for predicting early radiation-induced lung injury after thoracic radiotherapy: a retrospective paired-CT study.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEarly radiation-induced lung injury remains a clinically relevant complication after thoracic radiotherapy. We compared pretreatment, posttreatment, delta radiomics, and combined models based on paired CT scans for early prediction of lung injury.
methodsThis retrospective study included 82 patients with paired CT scans acquired before and after thoracic radiotherapy. The cohort was divided into a training set (n = 57) and an independent test set (n = 25). The endpoint was grade 1 or higher radiation-induced lung injury within 3 months after radiotherapy according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (CTCAE V5.0). Delta radiomics features were defined as posttreatment minus pretreatment values. Five signatures were constructed: clinical, pre, post, delta, and combined. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration analysis, DeLong testing, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsOnly nodal (N) classification remained significant in multivariable analysis (OR 1.189, 95% CI 1.044-1.354, P = 0.030). In the test cohort, the post signature outperformed the pre signature (AUC 0.844 vs. 0.681). The delta signature achieved the best performance among the radiomics-only models, with a test AUC of 0.882, accuracy of 0.840, sensitivity of 0.889, and specificity of 0.812. The combined signature achieved the highest overall test AUC at 0.889, but the gain over the delta model was limited.
conclusionPosttreatment and delta radiomics outperformed pretreatment radiomics for predicting early radiation-induced lung injury after thoracic radiotherapy. The temporal imaging change captured by paired CT may provide the most informative signal for early risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42347871What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.