ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2026
Artificial and Other Non-Nutritive Sweeteners, the Microbiome, and Cardiometabolic Health.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIn this narrative review complemented by a novel meta-analysis, we critically analyzed current scientific evidence from RCTs and cohort studies regarding the impact of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) on cardiometabolic health, and assessed the interplay with the gut microbiome as a potential mechanistic pathway. We focused on the question of direct physiological effects of NNS, rather than the additional effects of energy displacement by NNS, to inform future research and the development of dietary and clinical guidelines. RECENT
findingsCohort studies assessing NNS from all dietary sources suggest that total NNS and each commonly used NNS are associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes, and that total intake and specific agents are associated with certain cardiovascular disease outcomes. These findings are consistent with prior evidence from cohorts focusing on NNS in beverages. Such observational evidence may be confounded by reverse causation: people at higher cardiometabolic risk choosing to use NNS. However, our new meta-analysis of RCTs with non-caloric comparators and a recent RCT on glycemia outcomes with human-to-mice microbiota transplant suggest that NNS have harmful effects on glucose-insulin homeostasis including fasting insulin, HbA1c, and glucose area under the curve during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), potentially mediated by effects on the composition and functional potential of the gut microbiome. The summed evidence supports potential long-term risk of cardiometabolic diseases associated with NNS intake and short-term harmful effects of NNS on glycemia. Future clinical trials of physiologic effects and molecular mechanisms will strengthen interpretations and causal inference. Given potential for harm, caution is warranted for the use of NNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42347889What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.