ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2026
Divergent molecular and circuit mechanisms underlie light entrainment of retinal and suprachiasmatic nucleus circadian clocks.
Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The circadian system aligns behavior and physiology with the 24-hour environmental cycle through a distributed network of clocks including the master pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and an autonomous retinal clock critical for local retinal physiology and function. Although both clocks are entrained by light, they differ in their photoreceptor inputs and light sensitivity. The specific contributions and mechanisms by which distinct photoreceptor pathways drive their photoentrainment, however, remain incompletely understood.In this study, we conducted a comprehensive transcriptomic and integrative comparative analysis of retinal and SCN circadian responses to 530 nm monochromatic light using mouse models lacking specific photoreceptors or key components of signaling pathways. Under photopic conditions, we found that each tissue displays distinct light-responsive transcriptional signatures across genotypes, yet both shared a conserved cluster of rod-driven immediate early-genes. Strikingly, the light-evoked transcriptional response was not sufficient to shift the phase of the SCN clock, in contrast to its robust phase-shifting effect on the retinal clock. Furthermore, by genetically disrupting rod/cone electrical coupling and pharmacologically isolating rod pathways, we identified the OFF-cone bipolar cell circuit as both necessary and sufficient to mediate light-induced phase resetting of the retinal clock. Together, these findings delineate the specialized retinal circuitry that supports circadian entrainment and highlight a fundamental divergence between retinal and SCN mechanisms of photic timekeeping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.