ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Factors Influencing Consultant Knee Surgeons' Decision Making in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Management in Athletes: An International Delphi Study.
Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProlonged surgical waiting lists and changing healthcare systems have raised questions about the best approach to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury management in athletes, highlighting the need for consultant knee surgeon consensus.
objectiveThe aim was to establish consultant knee surgeon consensus on ACL injury management for athletes.
methodsTwenty-two male consultant knee surgeons from the United Kingdom (UK) (n = 18), Australia (n = 2), and Canada (n = 2) completed all three rounds of a Delphi survey between April and September 2024, responding to statements developed from the existing literature and clinical expertise.
resultsMedian responses ranged from strong agreement to strong disagreement, indicating diverse views, with narrower interquartile ranges in later rounds suggesting increasing consensus. Agreement was observed for rehabilitation‑focused approaches, patient involvement in shared decision making, and clinical factors such as knee stability and concomitant injury, while patient age and level of sport were less consistently prioritised. Disagreement persisted regarding surgical risk, including whether surgery would be required, and graft preferences (autologous versus synthetic). Some items reached full agreement (100%) or showed clustered responses (interquartile range = 0). Most items were stable between rounds (Wilcoxon: p = 0.16-1.00), although variability was observed for first-choice management, inclusion of lateral extra-articular procedures, and preferred lateral extra-articular procedure type, despite minimal median change (Wilcoxon: p = 0.02-0.09). Kendall's W indicated strong agreement in round 2 (W = 0.532, p < 0.001) and round 3 (W = 0.672, p < 0.001).
conclusionsThese findings may support clinicians and athletes in navigating complex treatment decisions, particularly where public healthcare delays challenge conventional surgical pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.