Evidence mapPaperPMID 42348067Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2026

Advances in Clinical Management Strategies for Sarcopenia: From Exercise and Nutrition to Pharmacotherapy and Comprehensive Interventions.

Fei Xue, Hongyi Xu, Xinlei Yao, Jie Wang, Jia Yi, Xia Li, Yuntian Shen, Bingqian Chen, Hualin Sun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fei Xue *Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, People's Republic of China.
Hongyi Xu *Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, People's Republic of China.
Xinlei Yao *Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, People's Republic of China.
Jie WangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, People's Republic of China.
Jia YiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, People's Republic of China.
Xia LiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, People's Republic of China.
Yuntian ShenJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, People's Republic of China.
Bingqian ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, First People's Hospital of Changshu City, Changshu, Jiangsu Province, 215500, People's Republic of China. cbq0433@suda.edu.cn.
Hualin SunJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226001, People's Republic of China. sunhl@ntu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcopenia is an aging-related syndrome characterized by the progressive decline of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function. With the accelerating global aging population, sarcopenia has emerged as a serious public health issue. It significantly impairs the quality of life in older adults and elevates the risks of falls, fractures, adverse comorbidity outcomes, and mortality. This review aims to systematically summarize recent advances in the clinical management of sarcopenia, focusing on evaluating evidence-based support for various intervention strategies. Exercise intervention remains the cornerstone of treatment, and multiple modalities-such as high-intensity resistance training, low-load blood flow restriction training, multicomponent training, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and telerehabilitation-have been proven effective in improving muscle mass and function. Nutritional support serves as a core strategy, wherein adequate protein intake (1.2-1.5 g/kg daily) and essential amino acids are critical. Specific nutrients, including β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, leucine-rich whey protein, vitamin D, and composite formulations targeting the "gut-muscle axis," demonstrate synergistic or independent muscle-protective effects in both preclinical and clinical studies. Although no pharmacotherapy is yet globally approved, several targeted drugs show potential for increasing muscle mass in clinical trials. These include agents acting on the myostatin/activin signaling pathway (e.g., Bimagrumab), androgen receptors (e.g., LPCN 1148), metabolic and endocrine pathways (e.g., active vitamin D, metformin), as well as anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory approaches (e.g., probiotics, anti-TNF-α agents). However, their functional benefits and long-term safety require further validation. Furthermore, comprehensive intervention and management strategies-particularly combined exercise and nutrition, multi-domain lifestyle interventions, individualized treatment based on screening and stratification, and prehabilitation programs for specific clinical populations such as those with chronic kidney disease, heart failure, or cancer-have been established as effective pathways to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. Despite notable progress, the field continues to face challenges including disease heterogeneity, inconsistent diagnostic criteria, poor long-term adherence to interventions, and inadequate functional translation of drug therapies. Future research should prioritize advancing precision medicine, optimizing personalized regimens, exploring novel biomarkers, and integrating and disseminating effective interventions into community and clinical practice to comprehensively improve the clinical management of sarcopenia.

Indexed as

ExerciseSarcopeniaAnimalsHumansMuscle, SkeletalComprehensive managementExercise therapyNutritional interventionPharmacotherapySarcopenia

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.