ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Thiazolidinedione-triazole hybrids: design, synthesis, and biological evaluation as dual inhibitors of α-amylase and aldose reductase with antioxidant activity for antidiabetic therapy.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Simultaneous targeting of multiple pathogenic pathways implicated in hyperglycemia and diabetic complications represents a promising therapeutic strategy for managing diabetes mellitus. Herein, we report the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a novel series of thiazolidinedione-triazole hybrid derivatives 9a-o as multi-target antidiabetic agents. The target compounds were synthesized through a convergent N-alkylation of 5-arylidene-thiazolidine-2,4-dione potassium salts with α-bromo ketone intermediates bearing a 1,2,3-triazole motif, and their structures were confirmed by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and elemental analysis. In vitro evaluation revealed potent dual inhibitory activity against α-amylase (α-AMY) and aldose reductase (AR) for several derivatives. Compound 9a emerged as the most promising candidate, with AR inhibition (IC₅₀ = 0.074 µM) surpassing epalrestat (IC₅₀ = 0.107 µM) and α-AMY inhibition (IC₅₀ = 14.57 µM) exceeding acarbose (IC₅₀ = 18.24 µM). Similarly, compound 9j demonstrated exceptional dual potency (AR IC₅₀ = 0.092 µM; α-AMY IC₅₀ = 19.36 µM). DPPH radical scavenging assessment further revealed significant antioxidant activity for the lead compounds, with 9a (IC₅₀ = 42.28 µM) and 9j (IC₅₀ = 56.71 µM) approaching the potency of ascorbic acid (IC₅₀ = 38.49 µM). In vivo evaluation of 9a in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic mouse model demonstrated a significant dose-dependent hypoglycemic effect, reducing blood glucose levels by approximately 44.6% relative to the diabetic control at 50 mg/kg after six weeks of oral treatment. Molecular docking studies provided mechanistic insights into the binding interactions that govern the observed inhibitory activities. Collectively, these results establish 9a and 9j as promising multi-target lead candidates for the further development of antidiabetic therapeutics that simultaneously address hyperglycemia, diabetic complications, and oxidative stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42348137What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.