ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
ReadChop: a high-performance demultiplexer for long-read sequencing data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryLong-read sequencing (LRS) platforms offer extended read lengths but present computational challenges due to high error rates and frequent insertion-deletion (indel) artifacts. While sample multiplexing is essential for cost-efficiency, existing demultiplexing solutions face a dichotomy: vendor-provided tools (e.g., Dorado) often lack the structural flexibility required for highly non-canonical designs, while open-source tools (e.g., Cutadapt) often lack the speed or algorithmic robustness to handle custom, high-complexity barcode designs. Here, we present ReadChop, a high-performance demultiplexer implemented in Rust. ReadChop leverages Myers' bit-parallel algorithm to efficiently model indel-rich error profiles and employs a streaming architecture to ensure low memory footprint. Benchmarking demonstrates that ReadChop achieves classification precision exceeding 99.99% on both simulated datasets-even under ultra-high multiplexing conditions (e.g., 13 824-plex)-and empirical SARS-CoV-2 amplicons. Furthermore, it excels in filtering in silico chimeras (0.1% miss rate) and exhibits linear computational scalability on ultra-long templates (up to 100 kb). Crucially, it significantly accelerates execution speeds-being >6 times faster than Dorado, >2 times faster than Nanoplexer, and >30 times faster than Cutadapt-with memory usage consistently below 200 MB. ReadChop provides a flexible, robust solution for processing massive LRS datasets with non-canonical experimental designs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and documentation are freely available under the MIT license at https://github.com/cherryamme/ReadChop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.