Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348542›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Feasibility and user evaluation of HopeBot: An LLM-powered conversational chatbot for depression screening.

Zhijun Guo, Alvina Lai, Julia Ive, Alexandru Petcu, Yutong Wang, Luyuan Qi, Johan H Thygesen, Kezhi Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06801925 (Evaluating the Effectiveness and Acceptability of a GPT-4o and RAG-Based Voice Chatbot for Depression Screening Using PHQ-9), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06801925 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Evaluating the Effectiveness and Acceptability of a GPT-4o and RAG-Based Voice Chatbot for Depression Screening Using PHQ-9

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2025 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsDepression - Major Depressive Disorder, Depression Anxiety DisorderArmsGPT-4o and RAG Voice Chatbot for PHQ-9 Screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhijun GuoInstitute of Health Informatics University College, London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1901-5191
Alvina LaiInstitute of Health Informatics University College, London, London, United Kingdom.
Julia IveInstitute of Health Informatics University College, London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexandru PetcuLancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Bamber Bridge, ‌United Kingdom.
Yutong WangInstitute of Health Informatics University College, London, London, United Kingdom.
Luyuan QiInstitute of Health Informatics University College, London, London, United Kingdom.
Johan H ThygesenInstitute of Health Informatics University College, London, London, United Kingdom.
Kezhi LiInstitute of Health Informatics University College, London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3073-3128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinician-administered Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) interviews allow clarification of ambiguous responses but are resource-intensive and difficult to scale for routine use. Self-administered versions are widely adopted for depression screening yet offer little opportunity for interaction or clarification, which may limit engagement and scoring accuracy. We developed HopeBot, a conversational chatbot powered by a large language model (LLM) that delivers the PHQ-9 via text or voice, providing real-time clarification and safety guidance through a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) layer drawing on validated psychological and helpline resources. The system aims to extend access to structured screening rather than replace clinician judgment. In a within-subject feasibility study, 132 adults from two countries completed both self-administered and chatbot-assisted PHQ-9 assessments followed by a 25-item evaluation survey. Chatbot and self-report scores showed high concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92; median absolute difference = 1 point), indicating faithful replication of scoring. Of these participants, 75 completed a comparative feedback module (most with identical scores were not prompted for comparison); 71% (n = 53) reported greater confidence in chatbot-assisted scores, citing clearer structure, interpretive guidance, and a supportive tone. Mean usability ratings (0-10) were 8.4 for comfort, 7.7 for voice clarity, 7.6 for handling sensitive topics, and 7.4 for recommendation helpfulness; the latter varied significantly by employment status and prior experience with mental-health services. The self-administered PHQ-9 served as a pragmatic comparator reflecting real-world digital screening, allowing evaluation of whether the chatbot could faithfully reproduce the questionnaire's structure and scoring accuracy rather than diagnostic validity. These findings indicate that an LLM-powered conversational agent with RAG-based grounding can feasibly and acceptably administer the PHQ-9 with strong score concordance relative to self-report, suggesting potential as a scalable adjunct for early, low-burden depression screening. Further validation against clinician-administered assessments in real-world workflows is warranted. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06801925.

Identifiers

PMID42348542
PMCPMC13298971

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.