ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding vaccinations among LGBTQIA+ community in Italy.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other sexually and gender-diverse populations (LGBTQIA+) are at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, and vaccinations coverage for Human Papillomavirus (HPV), hepatitis A (HAV), hepatitis B (HBV), monkeypox (Mpox) and the associated determinants among 1944 LGBTQIA+ individuals in Italy. The survey was conducted between May and July 2025, through an internet-based questionnaire. Only 14.2% correctly identified HPV, HBV, HAV, and Mpox as STIs. Those younger, with university degree, in non-monogamous relationship, men who have sex with men, those with a chronic condition, with higher number of sexual partners in the last 12 months, those who were not binary, and who received information from healthcare workers (HCWs) were more knowledgeable. Only 31.7% considered all four vaccinations very useful, and this was more likely among those with university degree, in non-monogamous relationship, in homosexual, who received information from HCWs, who did not need additional information, who knew the sexual transmission of the infections, and reported condom use every time. Only 7.4% received all four vaccinations, while 39.6% received none. Younger age, having been tested for STIs, considering all vaccinations very useful, and having received information from HCWs were associated with higher uptake. Only 46.9% were willing to receive missing vaccinations. Younger age, non-monogamous relationship status, no prior testing for STIs, considering all four vaccinations very useful, higher perceived risk of being infected, having received one to three vaccinations, and needing additional information were associated with willingness. These findings highlight the role of HCWs in delivering information and prevention recommendations to improve knowledge and vaccination uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.