ArticleEBioMedicine2026
Empowering digital health management with on-device large language models for glucose prediction: a model development and validation study.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-term management of chronic diseases such as diabetes is increasingly based on wearable technologies, particularly continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), integrated with smartphone-based digital health systems. When combined with artificial intelligence, especially deep learning, these systems offer highly personalised decision support, including glucose prediction. Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across various healthcare tasks, their integration into day-to-day digital health remains limited, primarily due to privacy concerns associated with transmitting sensitive data to remote servers. Recent advances in lightweight LLMs create new opportunities for secure and local deployment.
methodsIn this study, we first evaluated the zero-shot glucose prediction performance of eight pretrained lightweight LLMs across multiple model families. None achieved clinically viable outputs, highlighting the need for domain-specific adaptation. To address this, we propose GluLLM, a multimodal adaptor-based framework that enhances pretrained LLMs for on-device glucose forecasting. GluLLM integrates CGM data, daily activity logs, and electronic health records using customised encoder and decoder modules while preserving the foundational capabilities of pretrained LLMs. We trained and evaluated GluLLM on the REPLACE-BG dataset, which includes 226 individuals with type 1 diabetes, and validated it on an external cohort comprising 207 individuals with type 2 diabetes or without diabetes.
findingsCompared with 15 state-of-the-art deep learning baselines for time-series prediction, GluLLM (LLaMA 3.2 1B backbone) demonstrated superior performance, with significantly lower 30-min root mean square error than the strongest baseline (Crossformer) on REPLACE-BG and Móstoles (20.6 ± 3.5 and 9.6 ± 2.9 mg/dL; p < 0.001), and improved hypoglycaemia prediction (glucose <70 mg/dL; AUROC: 0.79 and 0.84; AUPRC: 0.55 and 0.60), respectively. Furthermore, deployment of GluLLM on two smartphone platforms demonstrated feasible computational requirements, with acceptable CPU and memory usage and low inference latency.
interpretationGluLLM demonstrates that LLMs can support the next generation of smartphone-based digital health systems, delivering real-time, privacy-preserving clinical decision support.
fundingNovo Nordisk Postdoctoral Fellowship run in partnership with the University of Oxford.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.