ReviewActa pharmacologica Sinica2026
Advancing PROTAC therapeutics through chemistry-guided design of smart delivery systems.
Review in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) have redefined the paradigm of targeted protein degradation by hijacking the endogenous ubiquitin-proteasome system. However, their clinical translation remains hampered by "beyond-rule-of-five" (bRo5) physicochemical liabilities, including high polarity, limited membrane permeability, and unpredictable pharmacokinetic behavior, which collectively lead to suboptimal bioavailability and risks of non-specific systemic distribution. This review focuses on the chemistry-driven evolution of delivery strategies to transform these molecular liabilities into pharmacological advantages. By integrating medicinal chemistry with delivery science, we propose a conceptual framework to optimize target selectivity, enhance cellular uptake, and broaden the therapeutic window, providing systematic guidance for overcoming the bottlenecks of PROTAC in vivo applications. In terms of molecular design, innovations in prodrug and linker engineering, including photo-responsive, enzyme-activated, folate-targeted, and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-triggered systems, achieve precise spatiotemporal regulation and controlled release of PROTAC activity. The field of delivery vehicles encompasses lipid-based, polymeric, and inorganic nanoscaffolds, as well as antibody-PROTAC conjugates (DACs) and aptamer-PROTAC hybrids (APCs), providing multidimensional platforms for crossing biological barriers and achieving antigen-dependent targeting. Furthermore, the emergence of modular self-assembly, membrane-targeting strategies, and "split-and-hybrid" paradigms signifies a shift toward programmable medicinal chemistry that integrates physicochemical tuning with pharmacokinetic optimization. Future integration of chemically reconfigurable carriers with unified PK-PD evaluation systems will further accelerate the clinical translation of next-generation intelligent PROTAC therapeutics. Challenges and innovative strategies in PROTAC delivery system design. PROTAC is regarded as a novel therapeutic strategy with unlimited potential. However, the poor water solubility and low cell permeability of PROTAC result in poor pharmacokinetic properties, thereby limiting the clinical application of PROTAC. The development of PROTAC delivery systems can accelerate the pace of their transformation from experimental to clinical use. These delivery systems can optimize the physicochemical properties of PROTAC, achieve targeted delivery, promote intracellular accumulation and enhance its degradation efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42350778What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.