Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42350841›Full record

ReviewEating and weight disorders : EWD2026

AI and machine learning for early identification of eating disorders: a narrative review and Indian contextual insights.

Yutika Shirgaonkar, Devaki Gokhale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yutika ShirgaonkarDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, Symbiosis School of Culinary Arts & Nutritional Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, SSCANS Building, Hill Base Campus, Lavale Village, Mulshi Taluka, Pune, Maharashtra, 412115, India.
Devaki GokhaleDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, Symbiosis School of Culinary Arts & Nutritional Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, SSCANS Building, Hill Base Campus, Lavale Village, Mulshi Taluka, Pune, Maharashtra, 412115, India. asstprofnd2@ssca.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEating disorders (EDs) are a growing global health concern and are increasingly associated with negative body-image perceptions linked to social-media exposure, particularly among adolescents. Early identification and screening of individuals at risk can influence effective patient management and care. AI models, such as machine learning, natural language processing, or wearables, have shown early promise as potential screening tools, offering early prediction, improved accuracy, reduced reporting bias, and better user compliance than conventional methods.

methodsLiterature from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2015-July 2025) produced 606 records after applying Boolean operators "OR" for synonyms and "AND" to link core concepts. 23 studies were included using the PICOT framework. Data extraction examined predictors, algorithms, metrics, and limitations.

resultsThe findings on predicting EDs highlight six major domains: traditional machine-learning (ML) models, sensor-based systems, mobile and wearable technologies, natural language processing (NLP), questionnaire-based models, and integrated risk prediction frameworks. Among all the domains, sensor-based and wearable systems, along with NLP from social-media data, demonstrated the highest accuracy. While traditional questionnaire-based models integrating validated tools with AI/ML have shown moderate performance, they remain limited by small sample sizes, standardised settings, and a lack of validation in low-resource settings, such as India.

conclusionsAI-based predictive models demonstrate promising early potential for scalable, likely less biased, and non-stigmatising detection of EDs. Despite the promising performance demonstrated across multiple AI-based approaches, certain challenges remain, including generalizability, ethical considerations, and real-world implications. Although most AI-based eating-disorder research has been conducted in high-income countries, evidence from developing and culturally diverse settings remains limited, where cultural variations and social stigma co-exist. In such contexts, the use of multimodal systems can support early prediction of eating disorders. Future research should be culturally diverse, integrate multimodal approaches with social and peer factors, and use validated frameworks for effective practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V. Opinions of respected authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFeeding and Eating DisordersMachine LearningEarly DiagnosisHumansIndiaPredictive Learning ModelsArtificial intelligenceDigital phenotypingEarly detectionEating disordersMachine learningPredictive modelling

Identifiers

PMID42350841
PMCPMC13558305

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.