ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2026
APRIL-targeted and dual BAFF/APRIL blockade in primary IgA nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.
Review in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAPRIL-targeted and dual BAFF/APRIL blockade are upstream immune approaches for primary IgA nephropathy. We evaluated their efficacy and safety in adults with this disease.
methodsPubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and other registries were searched from inception to 8 May 2026. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of APRIL-targeted or dual BAFF/APRIL blockade in adults with biopsy-confirmed primary IgA nephropathy were included. The primary outcome was relative change in proteinuria, analyzed as the log ratio of means and back-transformed to the ratio of means (RoM). Serious adverse events were pooled as odds ratios. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using RoB 2 and GRADE.
resultsNine full-text reports representing six independent trials were included. Five trials with 768 participants contributed to the primary proteinuria analysis. Active treatment reduced proteinuria versus placebo, with a pooled RoM of 0.539 (95%CI 0.477-0.609; p < 0.0001), corresponding to 46.1% lower proteinuria. Heterogeneity was low (I
conclusionAPRIL-targeted and dual BAFF/APRIL blockade reduced short-to-medium-term proteinuria in adults with primary IgA nephropathy. Longer follow-up is needed to clarify durability, immune safety and kidney outcome benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42350870What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.