ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Machine learning for predicting institutionalization and mortality risks among older home care recipients with routinely collected need assessment data: explainable AI for long-term care.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying older home care recipients at risk of institutionalization in advance is crucial for providing preventive services. Supporting the decision-making of care workers in prioritizing their limited resources would be useful for promoting an aging-in-place policy.
objectiveThis study aims to develop and interpret explainable machine learning (ML) methods for predicting institutionalization and mortality as competing events among older adults newly entering the Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) home care system. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe explored and evaluated ML algorithms using routinely collected standardized functional assessment data to examine the care needs of 36,526 older beneficiaries enrolled in a nationwide public LTCI program. Individuals were classified according to whether institutionalization or death occurred first during follow-up. Accordingly, we employed multinomial logistic regression (MLR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and random forest (RF) algorithms to predict institutionalization and death in a multinomial approach. The performance of the model was assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and expected calibration error (ECE). Youden's J statistic was used to determine the cutoff point.
resultsAmong newly enrolled home care beneficiaries, 10.4% were institutionalized in long-term care facilities within six months, increasing to 18.8% within 12 months after the initiation of long-term care services. The LASSO model achieved the best performance, with the most predictive features of institutionalization including eating nonfood items which marked the advanced dementia, need for suctioning (aspiration care) and dementia diagnosis. The most predictive features of mortality included need for oxygen therapy, cancer pain management and diabetic foot care.
conclusionThe newly developed algorithm may be implemented to examine the care needs of older home care users without additional risk assessment and for early intervention to reduce institutionalization risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.