ArticleBMC health services research2026
Exploring innovation landscapes: a national cross-sectional study of Swedish primary care from the viewpoint of primary care managers.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInnovation is increasingly necessary in primary care policy, and healthcare managers play a pivotal role in translating policy ambitions into practice and shaping organisational conditions that foster innovation. The aim of this study was to explore innovation activities and their contextual conditions in Swedish primary care, as perceived by primary care managers.
methodsA national cross-sectional mixed-methods survey was conducted across Swedish primary care centres. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analysed using systematic text condensation.
resultsIn total, 392 of the 1,028 invited primary care managers responded to the questionnaire. Approximately 80% of primary care managers reported product, process or organisational innovations, reflecting relatively high innovation activity at primary care centres. Innovation ideas predominantly emerged from within the primary care centre, and managers viewed themselves as playing a central role in generating these ideas. Most innovation activities involved internal collaboration between staff groups (86%) and units (62%), with limited external collaboration (6%-12%). Leadership was central in engaging staff with innovation and cultivating an innovation-supportive culture. Managers provided time, space and organisational support for continuous competence development. However, organisational and resource constraints limited staff involvement in innovation, as primary care remains tightly bound to economic and production-related demands.
conclusionThis study offers an overview of the innovation landscape in Swedish primary care from the perspective of primary care managers and contributes empirical knowledge on how innovation is understood and managed across different primary care contexts in Sweden. While Swedish primary care demonstrates strong engagement in innovation, the involvement of and collaboration with external stakeholders remain limited, underscoring the need for system-level strategies and processes to facilitate cross-sector innovation partnerships. Further research is needed on how system-level frameworks for collaboration and innovation can be established across the Swedish healthcare system, including primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.