Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351137›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Exploring innovation landscapes: a national cross-sectional study of Swedish primary care from the viewpoint of primary care managers.

Sarah Samuelson, Eva-Lisa Petersson, Cecilia Björkelund, Marcus Praetorius Björk, Dominique Hange, Malin Östman, Sven Persson Kylén, Irene Svenningsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah SamuelsonGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. sarah.samuelson@vgregion.se.
Eva-Lisa PeterssonGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Cecilia BjörkelundGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Marcus Praetorius BjörkGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Dominique HangeGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Malin ÖstmanGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sven Persson KylénResearch, Education, Development & Innovation (REDI), Region Västra Götaland, Primary Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Irene SvenningssonGeneral Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInnovation is increasingly necessary in primary care policy, and healthcare managers play a pivotal role in translating policy ambitions into practice and shaping organisational conditions that foster innovation. The aim of this study was to explore innovation activities and their contextual conditions in Swedish primary care, as perceived by primary care managers.

methodsA national cross-sectional mixed-methods survey was conducted across Swedish primary care centres. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analysed using systematic text condensation.

resultsIn total, 392 of the 1,028 invited primary care managers responded to the questionnaire. Approximately 80% of primary care managers reported product, process or organisational innovations, reflecting relatively high innovation activity at primary care centres. Innovation ideas predominantly emerged from within the primary care centre, and managers viewed themselves as playing a central role in generating these ideas. Most innovation activities involved internal collaboration between staff groups (86%) and units (62%), with limited external collaboration (6%-12%). Leadership was central in engaging staff with innovation and cultivating an innovation-supportive culture. Managers provided time, space and organisational support for continuous competence development. However, organisational and resource constraints limited staff involvement in innovation, as primary care remains tightly bound to economic and production-related demands.

conclusionThis study offers an overview of the innovation landscape in Swedish primary care from the perspective of primary care managers and contributes empirical knowledge on how innovation is understood and managed across different primary care contexts in Sweden. While Swedish primary care demonstrates strong engagement in innovation, the involvement of and collaboration with external stakeholders remain limited, underscoring the need for system-level strategies and processes to facilitate cross-sector innovation partnerships. Further research is needed on how system-level frameworks for collaboration and innovation can be established across the Swedish healthcare system, including primary care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDiffusion of InnovationOrganizational InnovationPrimary Health CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLeadershipSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenCollaborationCross-sectional studyDigitalisationHealthcare managementHealthcare policyInnovationMixed methods.Primary care

Identifiers

PMID42351137
PMCPMC13308186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.