ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Pulse Oximetry-A Perioperative Perspective.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulse oximetry is an essential standard monitor in modern anesthetic practice, enabling continuous noninvasive assessment of arterial oxygen saturation and pulse rate throughout the perioperative period. Since its introduction into clinical medicine, pulse oximetry has significantly improved patient safety by facilitating early detection of hypoxemia and physiologic deterioration. Despite its widespread use, clinicians may underrecognize the technical principles, physiologic assumptions, and limitations that influence measurement accuracy. This review provides a perioperative perspective on pulse oximetry, including the physics of photoplethysmography, sensor technologies, and practical considerations for optimal probe placement and signal acquisition. Sources of inaccuracy such as motion artifact, low perfusion states, dyshemoglobinemias, ambient light interference, skin pigmentation, and venous pulsation are discussed in detail. The review further examines perioperative applications across preoperative evaluation, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative recovery, while also exploring advanced parameters including perfusion index (PI) and pleth variability index (PVI). Emerging innovations such as multi-wavelength systems and artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced signal analysis are also highlighted. A comprehensive understanding of pulse oximetry allows anesthesiologists to appropriately interpret monitor data, recognize device limitations, and optimize perioperative patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.