Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42351883›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Graph Neural Networks for Medical Imaging Analysis and Biological Data: Integrating Topology, Geometry, Radiomics, and Generative AI.

Yashbir Singh, Yassine Himeur, Colleen M Farrelly, Peguy Kem-Meka Tiotsop Kadzue, Jennifer Z Rozenblit, Amina Kunovac, Isabelle C Pappas, Ashok Choudhary, Sara Salehi, Shadi Atalla and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yashbir SinghDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5848-7072
Yassine HimeurCollege of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Dubai, Academic City, Dubai 14143, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-5587
Colleen M FarrellyStaticlysm LLC, Miami, FL 33157, USA.
Peguy Kem-Meka Tiotsop KadzueDepartment of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Bertoua, Bertoua 00237, Cameroon.
Jennifer Z RozenblitDepartment of Mathematics, The University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7260-700X
Amina KunovacUPMC Genome Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Isabelle C PappasCooper Medical School, Rowan University, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
Ashok ChoudharyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-1249-5762
Sara SalehiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3223-9059
Shadi AtallaCollege of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Dubai, Academic City, Dubai 14143, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-3017-9243
Quincy A HathawayDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8226-2319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are increasingly used for medical imaging analysis and biological data modeling, where the integration of radiomics, topology, geometry, and generative artificial intelligence (AI) may improve representation learning from medical images and related biomedical data. Across the reviewed literature, GNNs show particular value for modeling spatial relationships, multimodal interactions, graph-structured biological networks, and non-Euclidean imaging features that are difficult to capture using conventional convolutional architectures alone. Topology- and geometry-aware approaches further expand this capability by encoding multi-scale structure, higher-order relationships, curvature, geodesic organization, and equivariant spatial priors. Hybrid graph-transformer models and generative graph methods represent emerging directions for modeling long-range dependencies, augmenting scarce datasets, supporting synthetic pretraining, and improving representation learning in low-label or heterogeneous biomedical settings. However, clinical translation remains limited by variability in graph construction, limited external validation, computational cost, scalability constraints, interpretability challenges, and uncertainty regarding the biological realism of synthetic data. Overall, this review highlights that GNN-based medical imaging analysis is most likely to advance when graph construction is biologically justified, model performance is evaluated across diverse clinical cohorts, and technical gains are paired with transparent validation, interpretability, and implementation strategies.

Indexed as

biological datagenerative AIgeometric deep learninggraph neural networksgraph transformersmedical imaging analysisradiomicstopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID42351883
PMCPMC13295888

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.