ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Towards Accurate Breslow Measurements: Mitigating Issues in Histopathological Imaging.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breslow thickness is a key prognostic parameter in the staging of cutaneous melanoma, but its manual measurement is affected by operator dependency and the complex morphology of the epidermis. Identifying both the deepest melanocyte and the correct perpendicular path to the epidermal surface can be challenging, especially in highly irregular tissues. This study investigates a more robust estimation of Breslow thickness through the development of a semi-automated Computer Vision-based software. Inter-operator variability was assessed by comparing measurements performed by seven histopathologists on 40 Whole Slide Images of non-ulcerated pT1a melanomas with Breslow thickness below 0.8 mm. The agreement between human measurements and AI results was evaluated. Significant variability in the orientation of the measurement segments was observed, highlighting the difficulty for human operators in identifying the correct perpendicular direction. A linear relationship was found between angular variance and variance in Breslow thickness values, linking epidermal irregularity to increased measurement uncertainty. Overall, statistically significant differences were observed between the AI system and five of the seven operators, indicating a general tendency among experts to overestimate Breslow thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.