Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352730›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Psychosocial Health Following Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation of Oculomotor Regions.

Suraj Upadhyaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Suraj UpadhyayaChicago College of Optometry, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5887-7054

Funding

Midwestern University 11-4080-1989-9656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional well-being is an important consideration when applying non-invasive brain stimulation to regions involved in visual and oculomotor control. This study assessed affective changes following transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the frontal eye field (FEF) and cerebellum using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Twenty-five healthy adults completed PANAS assessments after anodal and sham tDCS delivered in separate sessions. A repeated-measures general linear model evaluated stimulation type (anodal vs. sham), stimulation site (FEF vs. cerebellum), and time (pre- vs. post-stimulation). For positive affect, no significant interaction or main effects were observed across type, site, or time (all

Indexed as

affective modulationbrain stimulationcerebellumfrontal eye fieldoculomotor neurosciencePANAStDCS

Identifiers

PMID42352730
PMCPMC13295526

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.