ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
From Innate Immunity to Cancer Therapy: Antimicrobial Peptides as Emerging Anticancer Agents.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The potential for the use of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as anticancer agents has garnered much interest because of their selective cytotoxicity to tumor cells and ability to evade multidrug resistance mechanisms. AMPs are shorter cationic amphiphilic molecules, part of our innate immune system, with direct membrane-disruptive activity and immunomodulatory effects. Anticancer peptides (ACPs) can be derived from natural biophysical sources or synthetically engineered, taking advantage of the unique biophysical properties of cancer cell membranes to exert their anti-tumor activities rapidly and often without significant effects on normal tissues. Advances in peptide engineering, such as D-amino acid substitution, cyclization, and PEGylation, combined with nanocarrier systems, have provided opportunities to improve peptide stability, bioavailability, and delivery to targeted sites. Studies in preclinical and clinical models show promise, indicating that AMPs and ACPs can induce immunogenic cell death, modify tumor microenvironments, and be used in combination with more conventional therapies. While the promise of AMPs and ACPs as relatively novel cancer therapeutics is substantial, challenges such as proteolytic degradation, dose-dependent toxicity, costs for production, and regulatory hurdles are notable. This review organizes the current literature on classification, mechanism(s) of action, delivery strategies, preclinical and clinical data, and provides areas for future work to improve and help speed their clinical translation as new cancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.