ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Hybrid Computational Modeling with Multi-Level Validation Identifies TK1-VIM as a Robust Therapeutic Pair in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid Computational Modeling with Multi-Level Validation Identifies TK1-VIM as a Robust Therapeutic Pair in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks effective molecular targets, leading to poor prognosis. Previous computational methods to identify targets have suffered from low druggability, high complexity, and lack of robust validation. We propose a hybrid methodology combining Boolean network modeling with semidefinite programming (SDP) to analyze a TNBC cell line network. The resulting therapeutic pair underwent a multi-level validation framework, including Boolean simulations, statistical uncertainty quantification (bootstrap), sensitivity analysis, and orthogonal computational support from AlphaGenome, a deep learning model from Google DeepMind. Our analysis identified TK1 and VIM as a computationally robust therapeutic pair. Dual inhibition achieved 99.03% similarity to the apoptotic state with a 95% confidence interval of [98.79%, 99.26%], and was statistically superior to alternative pairs (p<0.001). The selection remained optimal across all tested model parameters, demonstrating high robustness. Importantly, the pair has full druggability because both targets have available specific inhibitors. Orthogonal computational evidence from AlphaGenome, stratified by mammary compartment, indicated that both targets exhibit moderate baseline expression in normal mammary epithelium (TK1 = 0.159, VIM = 0.143 in normalized RNA-seq units;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.