ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Risk Assessment for Venous Thrombosis in Lymphoma and Emerging Biomarkers.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous Thrombosis is a frequent and clinically significant complication in lymphoma patients, resulting in increased morbidity, mortality and therapeutic challenges. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying lymphoma-associated thrombosis are multifactorial, involving patients' clinical characteristics, tumour biology, systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and therapy-induced prothrombotic changes. Traditional predictive tools for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) have shown suboptimal application in lymphoma patients due to disease-specific heterogeneity. The ThroLy score was developed as a lymphoma-specific model incorporating parameters such as extranodal involvement, mediastinal disease, performance status, a prior venous thromboembolic event, and specific laboratory values. While it shows improved predictive value compared with general CAT models, its accuracy remains limited, particularly across different lymphoma subtypes and treatment regimens. Research in the field has therefore focused on evaluating emerging biomarkers-D-dimer, microparticles and inflammatory cytokines-as risk assessment tools. Integrative approaches that combine clinical variables with such biomarkers may yield a more dynamic and individualised risk-prediction model to guide thromboprophylactic strategies. The present review summarises current knowledge on thrombotic risk assessment across lymphoma subtypes and highlights the potential role of novel biomarkers in developing a more precise approach to thrombosis prevention and management. Importantly, it provides a comprehensive overview of currently available literature, highlighting the need for personalised thrombosis risk stratification strategies in lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.