ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Corneal Endothelial Progenitors for Ocular Regeneration: Translating Discovery into Clinical Therapies.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The corneal endothelium is essential for maintaining corneal transparency through active fluid transport and barrier function. Corneal cell loss from disease, ageing or surgical trauma underlies a significant proportion of corneal blindness worldwide, with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) representing the dominant clinical indications for corneal transplantation. While Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has substantially improved surgical outcomes, the procedure remains constrained by global donor tissue shortage. Regenerative medicine offers a compelling alternative by exploiting the latent proliferative and reparative potential of corneal endothelial progenitor populations. This review synthesises current knowledge on the foundational biology of corneal endothelial progenitor populations and the optimisation of expansion platforms to emerging preclinical and clinical evidence for both cell-based and pharmacological regenerative strategies. We also consider the outstanding translational challenges of potency standardisation, GMP-compliant manufacturing and regulatory navigation, as well as the longer-term potential of biomaterial-cell platforms and personalised iPSC-based medicine. The cumulative evidence positions progenitor-based approaches as viable and increasingly well-characterised alternatives to conventional donor transplantation, although their routine clinical use awaits the optimisation of manufacturing and regulatory platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.