SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Natural Compounds for the Treatment of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most common non-melanoma skin cancers worldwide. Although surgery and adjuvant therapies are often effective, the treatment of high-risk or advanced lesions remains challenging due to recurrence, resistance, toxicity, and limited long-term control. Natural compounds have, therefore, gained interest as multi-target agents for cancer prevention and treatment. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the antitumoral activity of natural compounds against cSCC. A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Sixty studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using a conservative, mechanism-based classification framework. The included studies evaluated purified compounds, crude extracts, essential oils, formulations, and combination treatments. Despite chemical diversity, antitumoral activity converged on defined biological processes, including apoptosis, non-apoptotic regulated cell death, redox modulation, oncogenic signaling inhibition, cell-cycle arrest, epigenetic regulation, photodynamic ROS generation, and chemopreventive or immune-mediated mechanisms. Mechanistic specificity was higher among purified compounds, while complex extracts showed broader, context-dependent effects. Several agents demonstrated consistent in vitro and in vivo activity, which supports their translational relevance. Natural compounds target shared biological vulnerabilities in cSCC through mechanistically convergent pathways. The framework presented here supports mechanism-guided prioritization and may facilitate the translation of promising compounds into clinically relevant strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.