ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Extracellular Vesicles in Regenerative and Cosmetic Medicine: Safety, Clinical Effectiveness, Therapeutic Applications, and Regulatory Challenges.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), particularly small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), are lipid bilayer-delimited particles involved in intercellular communication through the transfer of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids; many products and studies in aesthetic medicine refer to these preparations as exosomes, although endosomal origin is not always demonstrated. This review examines current evidence on the mechanisms, clinical effectiveness, safety, therapeutic applications, and regulatory challenges of EV- and sEV-based interventions, complemented by an exploratory qualitative assessment of physicians' perceptions regarding clinical implementation. A narrative review of studies indexed in Scopus and PubMed was conducted with emphasis on skin rejuvenation, hair restoration, wound healing, pigmentation disorders, and inflammatory dermatoses, and responses from 12 aesthetic physicians in Colombia were analyzed qualitatively. Available evidence suggests that EVs/sEVs may promote extracellular matrix remodeling, angiogenesis, immunomodulation, and tissue repair, with potential benefits across several aesthetic and regenerative indications. However, the literature remains heterogeneous and limited by variability in biologic sources, isolation and administration protocols, insufficient high-quality clinical trials, and unresolved regulatory issues. Reports of adverse reactions linked to unapproved products marketed as exosome-based formulations further highlight the need for stronger oversight. EVs, particularly sEVs, often referred to as exosomes in the aesthetic literature, remain a promising therapeutic platform, but safe clinical integration requires rigorous validation, technical standardization, and robust regulatory frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.