Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42354199›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Child-Driven Assessment of Plate Waste and Food-Waste Awareness in Primary Schools.

Barbara Peraboni, Vanessa Lupetti, Vera Lavelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Barbara PeraboniDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Vanessa LupettiDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Vera LavelliDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8606-757X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food waste in school canteens is widely recognized as a significant issue because of its economic consequences, environmental impact, and implications for children's health. Previous studies have used robust methods to quantify this problem and assess mitigation strategies. This case study of primary school children (6-11 years) used a child-driven approach to measure plate waste and explore reasons for uneaten food and concern about waste. The results indicated that a group of volunteer children (n = 104) directly involved in the assessment were able to evaluate their peers' food waste, obtaining estimates comparable to those reported in previous studies (mean: 108.4 g per child). The students for whom food waste was measured (n = 443) took part in interviews and proved to be active participants capable of evaluating their own context, although their level of engagement could be further strengthened. Among children who reported leaving food uneaten, a substantial proportion provided specific reasons; nevertheless, generic explanations accounted for 26% of responses for the first course and 35% for the second. Approximately 78.5% of the children demonstrated a high level of sensitivity to food waste, recognizing its direct effects (wasting their parents' money), indirect effects (waste in a broader sense), and social effects (world hunger/poverty). Establishing a baseline for children's sensitivity to their own food waste is therefore needed, as it could serve as an indicator of both the urgency and the effectiveness of educational interventions.

Indexed as

awarenesschild-driven assessmentfood waste educationplate wasteprimary schoolschool canteen

Identifiers

PMID42354199
PMCPMC13297634

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.