ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
A Qualitative Phenomenological Study of Treatment Options for Patients with SCD and Chronic Pain: Buprenorphine-Naloxone or Full-Agonist Therapy.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data in sickle cell disease (SCD) shows that 30-50% of adults have chronic pain. Chronic pain is a life-shaping condition that is often inadequately managed with chronic opioid therapy (COT). Buprenorphine-naloxone (bup-nal) is an alternative (to COT), yet patient perspectives on its use remain limited. This is a phenomenological qualitative study exploring how adults with SCD experience chronic pain and consider treatment options including COT and bup-nal. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 adults with SCD and chronic pain who were offered pain management with bup-nal, including individuals who declined or discontinued treatment. Participants described pain as a constant, embodied experience around which they structured their daily functioning, relationships, well-being, and treatment. Those receiving bup-nal consistently reported improved daily functioning, greater independence, enhanced mood, and reduced healthcare utilization. In contrast, participants not receiving bup-nal described ongoing pain interference, reduced daily functioning, and continued reliance on acute care services. Importantly, participants emphasized functional improvement and stability, rather than pain elimination, as the most meaningful outcomes. These findings suggest that buprenorphine-naloxone may shift pain from a dominant, disabling experience to a more manageable condition that improves participation in work, relationships, and daily activities. To optimize management of chronic pain in SCD, it is necessary to align treatment with patient priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.