ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Harnessing Lessons from Gel-Based and Advanced Biomaterial Therapeutics to Enable Direct Cellular Reprogramming.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Direct cellular reprogramming, the conversion of one somatic cell type into another, represents a remarkable advancement in regenerative medicine. Its potential to transform fibrotic tissue into functional parenchyma underscores its therapeutic promise. However, several critical challenges remain unresolved, including limited reprogramming efficiency, the long-term functional stability of converted cells, their integration within pre-existing cellular circuits, and safety concerns related to transgene integration and immunological responses to reprogramming-based viral vectors. Approaches based on the exogenous administration of recombinant proteins and miRNAs have also emerged, though these rely on factors that are naturally prone to exhaustion and degradation, potentially restricting their efficacy. This review is divided into three main sections. The first part addresses direct cellular reprogramming in the context of other cell-based applications, outlining its main applications and current biological limitations. The second part examines how different biomaterials, ranging from hydrogel scaffolds to nanoparticles, can modulate direct cellular reprogramming by providing mechanical and topographical cues and by enabling tighter control over the concentration and spatiotemporal dynamics of reprogramming factors and viral vectors. The third part discusses key findings in biomaterial-assisted reprogramming strategies, highlighting emerging opportunities for clinically translatable approaches. The convergence of regenerative biology and biomaterials science may ultimately generate advanced gel-based and hybrid cellular reprogramming platforms for in vitro testing and, in situ applications, for promoting cell fate stabilization and facilitating the regeneration of damaged tissues and organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.