ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Using Explainable Machine Learning to Identify Determinants of Spinal Deformities in Children: It's Not Only About What, but Also About How.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpinal deformities in children represent a relevant public health issue, with possible long-term consequences. Timely identification of their determinants is essential for adequate prevention.
methodsThis study was a secondary analysis of data from the 2019 Serbian National Health Survey, including 1309 children aged 5-14 years. Logistic regression with LASSO regularization and multiple ML algorithms were tested, with XGBoost selected as the optimal model. Class imbalance was addressed using class weighting and SMOTE. Model interpretability was achieved using SHAP analysis.
resultsThe prevalence of spinal deformities was 8.6%. Univariable analyses showed that age, poorer self-rated health, chronic illness, recent injuries, and pes planus were significantly associated with spinal deformities. Family-related variables showed no significant associations. Among the evaluated models, XGBoost demonstrated the most stable performance across the applied evaluation metrics and the best balance between predictive performance and interpretability. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis showed that pes planus was the strongest determinant, followed by age and chronic illness, while socio-demographic and family factors had minimal influence.
conclusionExplainable machine learning models, particularly XGBoost combined with SHAP, can allow for the identification and interpretation of key determinants of spinal deformities in children. Pes planus was shown to be modifiable and relevant associated determinant, supporting its importance in early screening and preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.