Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42354483›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Integrated Service Delivery Models for Triple Elimination of Mother to Child Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Syphilis, and Hepatitis B Virus: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Victor Abiola Adepoju, Abdulrakib Abdulrahim, Qorinah Estiningtyas Sakilah Adnani, Shankar Biswas, Safayet Jamil, Uthman Okikiola Adebayo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victor Abiola AdepojuDepartment of HIV and Infectious Diseases, Jhpiego Nigeria (An Affiliate of Johns Hopkins University), Abuja 900911, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-8379-1001
Abdulrakib AbdulrahimDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2939-7086
Qorinah Estiningtyas Sakilah AdnaniDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40161, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-4625-4861
Shankar BiswasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, 76000 Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.ORCID 0009-0005-2421-3953
Safayet JamilDepartment of Public Health, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-2313-4920
Uthman Okikiola AdebayoDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Aro, Abeokuta 110101, Nigeria.ORCID 0009-0000-2000-7451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesDespite global commitment to the World Health Organization triple elimination initiative, evidence on integrated antenatal service delivery models that simultaneously address human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), syphilis, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains fragmented, particularly across diverse health-system contexts. Eliminating vertical transmission of HIV, syphilis, and HBV is a global priority. Pregnant women are disproportionately affected by these infections, and untreated maternal disease leads to significant infant morbidity. Integrating antenatal screening and treatment provides an opportunity to address all three conditions simultaneously. PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify and synthesise evidence on integrated antenatal service delivery models addressing HIV, syphilis, and HBV simultaneously within maternal health services. It specifically examined model characteristics, screening uptake, treatment and follow-up outcomes, implementation barriers and facilitators, and evidence on cost-effectiveness.

methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261342186). We searched Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Dimensions for studies published between January 2007 and January 2026. Of 423 records identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria after excluding two studies that did not provide empirical results for an integrated service model addressing all three target infections simultaneously. Data on study characteristics, service delivery, diagnostics, outcomes, and implementation factors were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using the DerSimonian-Laird estimator with logit transformation.

resultsEleven studies covered Asia, Africa, Europe, and Latin America, mostly in low- and lower-middle-income countries. Integration ranged from rapid test packages in community clinics to comprehensive programmes including STI treatment, malaria testing, and HBV birth-dose vaccination. Pooled triple testing uptake was 97% (95% CI 92 to 100%). Large programmes achieved over 99% coverage and reduced HIV vertical transmission to below 3%. Pilot studies showed feasibility but noted stockouts, data gaps, and weak treatment linkage. Economic analyses supported cost-effectiveness.

conclusionsIntegrated antenatal services appear feasible and can achieve high testing uptake, particularly in well-supported programmes. However, evidence remains uneven regarding treatment completion, infant follow-up, HBV prophylaxis, long-term transmission outcomes, and sustainability in resource-constrained settings. Key challenges include supply constraints, workforce limitations, and follow-up gaps. Future research should evaluate the full care cascade, not screening uptake alone.

Indexed as

hepatitis B virusHIVmeta-analysisprenatal caresyphilissystematic reviewtriple elimination of mother-to-child transmission

Identifiers

PMID42354483
PMCPMC13299941

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.