Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42355431›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Radiobiological Effect of Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Beam Delivery Parameters on A549 and MCF-7 Cell Survival: An In Vitro Study.

Cemile Ceylan, Kamil Can Kılıç, Ahmet Öztürk, Canan Öztürk, Yusufhan Yazır, Maksut Görkem Aksu, Özcan Gündoğdu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cemile CeylanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medicalpark Istanbul Oncology Hospital, 34180 Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6423-8956
Kamil Can KılıçDepartment of Stem Cell, Institute of Health Sciences, Kocaeli University, 41380 Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Ahmet ÖztürkDepartment of Stem Cell, Institute of Health Sciences, Kocaeli University, 41380 Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Canan ÖztürkDepartment of Stem Cell, Institute of Health Sciences, Kocaeli University, 41380 Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Yusufhan YazırDepartment of Stem Cell, Institute of Health Sciences, Kocaeli University, 41380 Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Maksut Görkem AksuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, 41380 Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Özcan GündoğduDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Kocaeli University, 41380 Kocaeli, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent improvements, such as flattening filter-free (FFF) beams, enable the delivery of treatments at higher dose rates and in shorter times. However, the biological influence still remains uncertain. Here, we examined how dose rate and dose per pulse influence responses to FFF beams compared with flattened beams in cancer cells with different radiosensitivities.

methodsA549 (lung, high α/β) and MCF-7 (breast, low α/β) cells were irradiated using VMAT (6 MV FF, 6 and 10 MV FFF; 600-2400 MU/min; 5-20 Gy). Cell viability was assessed by the WST-1 assay, and reproductive survival by clonogenic assay.

resultsThe responses differed by cell type and dose, with A549 exhibiting restricted sensitivity, demonstrating more pronounced effects at 10 Gy, while MCF-7 displayed greater responsiveness at 5-10 Gy under elevated dose rates. At 20 Gy, differences were reduced. Metabolic readouts did not consistently match clonogenic survival. Conclusions

Indexed as

A549clonogenic assaydose per pulsedose rateflattening filter-freeMCF-7radiosensitivity

Identifiers

PMID42355431
PMCPMC13302126

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.