Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42355442›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Optimizing Timing and Dose of Starting Norepinephrine and Vasopressin in Septic Shock.

Gaku Hiroto, Mitsuaki Nishikimi, Nobuaki Shime

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gaku HirotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
Mitsuaki NishikimiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2342-7245
Nobuaki ShimeDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in septic shock management, optimal vasopressor strategies remain understudied. Norepinephrine (NE) is recommended as the first-line vasopressor for restoring arterial pressure; however, excessive catecholamine exposure has been associated with adverse events, including arrhythmias, ischemia, and poor clinical outcomes. While the early initiation of NE is increasingly recognized as important, uncertainty persists regarding the optimal starting dose and escalation strategy. In septic shock, particularly refractory septic shock, reduced vascular responsiveness may limit the effectiveness of escalating NE doses and increase the risk of dose-related complications. Vasopressin (AVP), a non-adrenergic vasopressor, provides complementary mechanisms to NE and may reduce catecholamine requirements. Randomized trials have not consistently demonstrated a survival benefit; AVP may improve hemodynamic stability and renal perfusion. Emerging evidence suggests the potential advantages of earlier AVP initiation at lower NE doses than those currently recommended. Collectively, the current evidence supports a strategy that prioritizes early and adequately dosed NE to achieve rapid hemodynamic stabilization, followed by the timely initiation of AVP once moderate NE requirements are reached, rather than the continued escalation of NE alone. Such an integrated approach may help balance efficacy and safety, and minimize catecholamine-related harm while optimizing perfusion in septic shock cases.

Indexed as

arterial pressurehypotensionsepsisshockvasopressor

Identifiers

PMID42355442
PMCPMC13302258

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.