ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cognitive Impairment: Elective Affinities or Fatal Attraction.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is strongly recommended in secondary cardiovascular prevention; indeed, in patients after cardiac surgery or with coronary artery disease or heart failure, this intervention is recommended to decrease mortality, morbidity, and disability, and to improve quality of life and cardiorespiratory fitness. Moreover, each step of the cardiovascular continuum denotes a potential risk factor for the progression of cognitive frailty; this interaction is highly prevalent, affecting approximately one-third of all patients in cardiology settings. For these reasons, CR should consider the patient's cognitive domain; however, cognitive assessment is still rarely integrated into standard CR protocols. Therefore, this comprehensive review presents current evidence and recent updates on the interaction between CR and cognitive impairment, focusing on physiological mechanisms, core components, benefits, and strategies for implementing CR in patients with cognitive frailty to optimize recovery and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.