ReviewNutrients2026
Reframing Nutraceuticals in Knee Osteoarthritis with Sarcopenia: A Muscle-Joint-Centered Narrative Review.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesKnee osteoarthritis (KOA) is increasingly recognized as a function-limiting condition in which pain, neuromuscular impairment, and reduced physical activity interact with sarcopenic vulnerability to accelerate functional decline. This review reappraises commonly used oral nutraceuticals through a muscle-joint framework and examines whether they can be conservatively positioned as adjuncts that reduce symptom-related barriers to exercise-based care rather than as disease-modifying therapies.
methodsThis review was conducted as a structured narrative synthesis informed by SANRA principles, using a structured and transparent search process and dual-independent study selection, without quantitative meta-analysis or formal certainty-of-evidence grading. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English-language studies published from January 2000 to March 2026, supplemented by reference screening of key reviews and international guidelines.
resultsMechanistic and clinical evidence supports a plausible pathway linking KOA pain, arthrogenic muscle inhibition, reduced loading, physical inactivity, and sarcopenic vulnerability. Across glucosamine/chondroitin, collagen peptides, omega-3 fatty acids, curcumin, and Boswellia, symptomatic benefits were modest, heterogeneous, and formulation-dependent, with no consistent evidence of structural disease modification. Direct evidence that nutraceuticals improve exercise adherence or long-term physical activity remains limited; however, selected exercise-integrated or function-oriented studies show participation-relevant signals in gait speed, activity volume, and performance-based outcomes.
conclusionsNutraceuticals should be interpreted as optional, time-limited adjuncts within exercise-centered KOA management. Their potential value lies in modest symptom support that may facilitate rehabilitation participation in selected patients, not in stand-alone treatment of KOA or sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.