ReviewNutrients2026
Vitamin D as a Lifespan Neuroimmune Signal in Psychiatry: From Developmental Risk to Precision Nutrition.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesVitamin D is a nutrient-related secosteroid system with endocrine, paracrine, immunological, and neurodevelopmental actions relevant to nutritional psychiatry. Psychiatric research has often treated vitamin D either as a cross-sectional correlate of depression or as a non-specific supplement expected to act across heterogeneous diagnostic categories. This narrative review aimed to develop a more discriminating framework in which vitamin D is considered a lifespan neuroimmune and immunometabolic signal whose psychiatric relevance depends on developmental timing, biological context, and phenotype.
methodsEvidence was integrated from developmental epidemiology, neonatal dried-blood-spot studies, randomized trials, meta-analyses, Mendelian randomization studies, clinical guidelines, and mechanistic neuroscience. The review focuses on prenatal and neonatal 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D-binding protein, free and bioavailable vitamin D, vitamin D receptor signaling, immune and microglial pathways, neurotransmitter systems, neurotrophic signaling, mitochondrial function, oxidative stress, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis regulation, and the gut-microbiota-immune-brain axis.
resultsThe available evidence does not support vitamin D as a universal treatment for psychiatric disorders. Instead, vitamin D deficiency and altered vitamin D biology appear most relevant in biologically and clinically defined risk states, including neurodevelopmental vulnerability, inflammatory depression, psychosis liability, severe mental illness with nutritional deprivation, metabolic comorbidity, and cognitive frailty. Mechanistic data support plausible links with cytokine biology, the tryptophan-kynurenine pathway, dopaminergic and serotonergic systems, stress regulation, and neuroimmune homeostasis.
conclusionsVitamin D should be conceptualized in psychiatry as a context-dependent neuroimmune and immunometabolic signal rather than a generic psychotropic intervention. Future studies should prioritize biomarker-enriched, developmentally timed, nutrition-centered models of precision prevention and adjunctive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.