Evidence mapPaperPMID 42356532Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026

AI in Drug Discovery: Clinical Failures, Regulatory Reality, and the Validation Crisis Behind the Hype.

Lisa Khairil, Koay Hean Seng Benny, Jesreena Jerry, Farhat Mussa Khatib, Muhammad Danial Che Ramli, Suresh Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa KhairilDepartment of Diagnostic and Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Management and Science University, Shah Alam 40100, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0007-5740-8305
Koay Hean Seng BennyDepartment of Diagnostic and Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Management and Science University, Shah Alam 40100, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jesreena JerryDepartment of Diagnostic and Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Management and Science University, Shah Alam 40100, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0008-5829-3746
Farhat Mussa KhatibDepartment of Diagnostic and Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Management and Science University, Shah Alam 40100, Selangor, Malaysia.
Muhammad Danial Che RamliDepartment of Diagnostic and Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Management and Science University, Shah Alam 40100, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5261-0391
Suresh KumarDepartment of Diagnostic and Allied Health Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Management and Science University, Shah Alam 40100, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5682-0938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the life sciences has accelerated significantly between 2022 and 2026, accompanied by global investment exceeding USD 100 billion and widespread expectations of a transformative impact in drug discovery. Despite these advances, the extent to which AI has improved clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study presents a structured narrative review evaluating the economic, technical, clinical, and regulatory dimensions of AI adoption in drug discovery. Current evidence indicates that clinical attrition rates remain high, with approximately 90% of drug candidates entering clinical development failing to achieve regulatory approval. Although AI systems such as AlphaFold have achieved high structural prediction accuracy, with predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT) scores exceeding 90 for well-structured proteins and root mean square deviation (RMSD) values comparable to experimental methods, limitations persist in modelling protein dynamics, post-translational modifications, and protein-ligand interactions. Clinical case studies demonstrate that while AI can accelerate early-stage discovery timelines, these advantages do not consistently translate into improved late-stage success rates. Furthermore, reproducibility challenges, limited data transparency, and regulatory gaps continue to constrain reliable implementation. These findings suggest that AI in drug discovery is currently in a transitional phase characterised by high investment but limited validated clinical impact. Future progress will depend on strengthening validation frameworks, improving data sharing practices, and aligning regulatory standards with real-world clinical performance.

Indexed as

AI bubbleAlphaFoldartificial intelligenceclinical translationdrug discoveryprotein structure predictionreproducibility crisis

Identifiers

PMID42356532
PMCPMC13304925

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.