ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Pharmacogenomic Stratification for Oncology Drug Repurposing: An Exposure Target Context Eligibility Framework.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In spite of plausible biology, the majority of oncology trials involving drug repurposing have failed to demonstrate any efficacy. Numerous factors can potentially cause failure, including issues with dosing, drug strength, the trial design itself, and patient diversity. A major, potentially correctable contributor is the absence of pharmacogenomic eligibility criteria. Here, we propose the Pharmacogenomic Stratification Framework for Drug Repurposing (PSDR), a novel framework for drug response that encompasses the triad of Exposure (E, pharmacokinetic adequacy), Target engagement (T, somatic tumor genomics), and Context competence (C, tumor microenvironment). These domains are represented as R = E × T × C, an eligibility model capturing the necessary, though not sufficient, conditions for anticancer drug activity. The model is not presented as an empirically validated quantitative law but as a conceptual framework to guide biomarker-stratified trial design. We derive five testable pharmacogenomic hypotheses for metformin, statins, beta-blockers, NSAIDs, and SSRIs, and propose a three-point PSDR eligibility scoring system. Prospective validation of each hypothesis in appropriately stratified cohorts is required before clinical implementation. The PSDR framework complements rather than replaces existing precision oncology resources (OncoKB, CIViC, PharmGKB, CPIC, DepMap, GDSC) by integrating germline pharmacokinetics, somatic genomics, and microenvironmental profiling for repurposed agents. If validated, PSDR-guided enrichment designs could substantially improve the efficiency and interpretability of repurposing trials. The PSDR framework should be considered a conceptual and hypothesis-generating model that requires prospective validation before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.