Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42356748›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Evaluating Convolutional and Transformer Architectures for Photovoltaic Defect Classification via Electroluminescence Imagery.

Seda Bayat Toksöz, Gültekin Işık, Gökhan Şahin, Erdal Akin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seda Bayat ToksözDepartment of Computer Engineering, Iğdır University, Iğdır 76000, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8427-9971
Gültekin IşıkDepartment of Computer Engineering, Iğdır University, Iğdır 76000, Türkiye.
Gökhan ŞahinMunicipality of Dronten, De Rede, 1, 8251 ER Dronten, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2862-2453
Erdal AkinDepartment of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroluminescence (EL) imaging is widely used for photovoltaic (PV) defect inspection, yet fair comparison of deep learning backbones remains difficult because datasets, labels, and protocols vary across studies. This work presents a controlled image-level benchmark of six architectures (ConvNeXt-T, ViT-B/16, DeiT-B/16, Swin-T, DenseNet121, and MobileNetV3-Large) across five hierarchical tasks for monocrystalline and polycrystalline cells with binary and multi-class labels. A balanced proprietary dataset of 20,000 single-cell EL images was evaluated with identical preprocessing, augmentation, training, and stratified five-fold cross-validation, yielding 150 runs. ConvNeXt-T achieved the highest mean macro-F1 (93.12%) while using about one-third of the parameters of base ViT/DeiT models. On the four-class polycrystalline task, it reached 84.94 ± 0.45% macro-F1, compared with 70.08 ± 1.19% for DenseNet121 and 59.43 ± 1.71% for MobileNetV3-Large. Error analysis revealed conservative missed-defect behavior in lightweight CNNs, especially for surface-level degradation and crack categories. The results provide image-level cross-validation evidence for controlled benchmarking and motivate future module-level grouped validation.

Indexed as

ConvNeXtconvolutional neural networkelectroluminescence imagingparameter efficiencyphotovoltaic defect classificationstratified cross validationvision transformer

Identifiers

PMID42356748
PMCPMC13307318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.