ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Modular Framework for Responsive and Explainable Robotic Assistance with Intention Prediction Using Human-Centric Digital Twins.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proactive robotic assistance in human-robot collaboration (HRC) requires systems that can perceive evolving task contexts, anticipate user needs, and intervene appropriately without disrupting human workflow. We present the Agentic Unified Robotic Assistance (AURA) Framework, which couples Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning grounded by Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) with a modular layer of specialized Intent, Motion, Perception, Sound, Affordance, and Performance Monitors that supply structured context to a central decision-making module, making the framework reconfigurable and auditable without retraining or re-prompting. We introduce a human-in-the-loop teleoperation data collection methodology and an offline evaluation scheme with an Appropriateness Score (A-Score) tailored to proactive intervention timing, and release a benchmark dataset of annotated multimodal HRC episodes containing workspace and robot wrist camera videos, robot joint states, and labeled intervention events. Across three tasks of varying complexity, we observe progressive gains in intent prediction and decision-making as the modules are supplied with richer grounded context (prior-state memory and tracked object locations), with Combined F1 rising by over 20 points between context-poor and context-rich conditions. The structured grounding allows lightweight multimodal backbones such as Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite to perform on par with heavier reasoning-tier models at roughly one-fifth the inference latency. Together, these contributions establish a scalable framework, benchmark, and evaluation methodology for advancing proactive robotic assistance in collaborative environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.