Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42357012›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Influence of 3D Printer Type, Resin Material, Thickness, and Geometry on the Mechanical Properties of Directly Printed Clear Aligners.

Fırat Oğuz, Sabahattin Bor, Buse Çebi Gül, Handan Göze Oğuz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fırat OğuzDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, İnönü University, Malatya 44280, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6040-3790
Sabahattin BorDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, İnönü University, Malatya 44280, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5463-0057
Buse Çebi GülDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, İnönü University, Malatya 44280, Türkiye.
Handan Göze OğuzPrivate Practice, Malatya 44280, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of three different 3D printers, two clear aligner resins, two specimen thicknesses, two lengths, and two geometric designs on the tensile strength and elastic modulus of directly printed clear aligners. Specimens were produced from two orthodontic aligner resins, Clear A (Senertek, Izmir, Turkey) and Tera Harz TA 28 (Graphy Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea), using three different 3D printers: Ackuretta SOL (LCD), Asiga MAX (DLP), and UNIZ NBEE (LCD). Specimens were designed in two forms (dumbbell, in accordance with ISO 527 3, and flat strip), in two thicknesses (0.5 mm and 1 mm), and in two lengths (short and long), yielding 24 groups with 5 specimens each (

Indexed as

3D printingclear alignerdirect printing resinelastic modulusorthodontic materialstensile strength

Identifiers

PMID42357012
PMCPMC13307045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.