ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Molecular Docking of Natural Compounds as DPP-4 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is an established therapeutic target in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), primarily due to its role in regulating incretin activity and glucose homeostasis. Although clinically approved DPP-4 inhibitors are widely used, their moderate efficacy has driven the search for novel compounds with improved properties. In this context, natural products have attracted considerable attention as a source of structurally diverse and biologically active molecules. At the same time, molecular docking has emerged as a key computational tool for the identification and evaluation of potential DPP-4 inhibitors. This review summarizes and critically analyzes current molecular docking studies of natural compounds targeting DPP-4. Over 150 studies were evaluated with respect to docking methodologies, selection of protein structures, and validation strategies. The results reveal substantial variability in computational protocols. Frequently used protein structures include ligand-bound DPP-4 models such as 1X70 and 6B1E. Among the investigated compounds, flavonoids represent the most extensively studied class, followed by alkaloids, phenolics, terpenoids, and peptides. Despite numerous reports of favorable binding interactions within the DPP-4 active site, many studies rely solely on docking results without further validation. The limited use of molecular dynamics simulations and experimental assays highlights a significant gap in the current literature. Overall, while molecular docking provides valuable preliminary insights, improved standardization and integration with complementary approaches are essential to enhance the reliability and translational relevance of in silico findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.