SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Effectiveness of different digital interventions on symptoms for children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents is often treated effectively with medication, though this approach requires careful monitoring for side effects and long-term use. Consequently, digital interventions are emerging as a convenient and acceptable supplementary or alternative treatment option. Objective: The present study aims to systematically compare the efficacy of various digital interventions on core symptoms in children and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD through a network meta-analysis. Method: A comprehensive literature search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science-from their inception to August 21, 2025. Outcome measures comprise three continuous variables: inattentive symptoms, hyperactive-impulsive symptoms, and executive function. These measures are assessed through subjective behavioral ratings or objective neuropsychological testing. Literature screening was conducted using EndNote 21 software. The quality of the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and the network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. Effect sizes were pooled using the standardized mean difference (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Given the diversity of digital interventions, the age range of study participants, and the complexity of the control groups, it was determined that random-effects models would be employed for all analyses. Results: Traditional meta-analyses a total of 37 randomized controlled trials involving 2,922 participants. results indicate that digital interventions yield significant improvements in inattention [SMD = -0.44, 95% CI (-0.62, -0.26)] and hyperactivity-impulsivity [SMD = -0.26, 95% CI (-0.41, -0.12)] compared to control conditions. Although digital interventions showed a trend toward improvement in executive function, this effect did not reach statistical significance [SMD = -0.41, 95% CI (-0.85, 0.02)]. Subgroup analysis revealed that, compared to the control group, significant improvements in inattention were observed in subgroups involving computer-based cognitive tasks, virtual reality technology, neurofeedback, subjective behavioral scoring, and objective neuropsychological testing (all Conclusion: This systematic review and network meta-analysis found that multiple digital interventions demonstrate positive effects in improving core symptoms of ADHD in children and adolescents. Cumulative Rank Probability Results from a Network Meta-Analysis of Subjective Measurement Tools, neurofeedback demonstrated the most pronounced advantage in ameliorating attention deficit symptoms, computerized cognitive tasks showed the greatest potential for alleviating hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms, while mobile gaming exhibited the strongest potential for enhancing executive function. Given methodological heterogeneity among existing studies and the limited number of relevant publications included in the analysis, these conclusions warrant cautious interpretation. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, identifier CRD420251126367.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.