ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
From artery to memory: a comparative review of vascular cognitive impairment surgical models.
Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) encompasses a spectrum of cerebrovascular diseases ranging from mild clinical cognitive impairment to advanced vascular dementia and is recognized as a major contributor to the global dementia burden. Frequently coexisting with Alzheimer's Disease (AD), VCI represents a complex, mixed-pathology neurodegenerative process driven by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion (CCH), white matter (WM) injury and volume loss, neurovascular dysfunction, and progressive cognitive decline. While numerous animal models have been developed to characterize the underlying mechanisms and identify therapeutic targets, the field is presently limited by the absence of a distinct framework to guide model selection based on unique pathophysiological features of recently delineated VCI subtypes. Surgical VCI models, including transient and permanent occlusion, stenosis, or gradual occlusion approaches, differ substantially in the duration of ischemic injury, severity of hypoperfusion, and mechanism of cerebral blood flow (CBF) reductions, generating diverse downstream effects on cerebral tissue damage, neuroinflammation, neurometabolic dysfunction, functional integrity, and, ultimately, memory function. No single model completely captures the heterogeneity of VCI pathology; however, each selectively captures unique aspects of disease subtypes. As such, this review aims to establish a clear, pathophysiology-driven framework to guide the selection of appropriate surgical VCI models for investigating specific VCI subtypes. To do so, we evaluate common models of carotid artery manipulation, integrating histological, neuroenergetic, and cognitive outcomes with clinically relevant imaging and patient data. This review provides practical guidance for model selection, enhancing the specificity and translational relevance of preclinical VCI investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.