ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose composite index and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate in adults undergoing routine health examinations: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reduced kidney function often develops in parallel with metabolic dysregulation and chronic low-grade inflammation, yet practical markers that capture both processes remain limited in routine screening settings. We evaluated whether the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose composite index (CTI), an integrated marker derived from hs-CRP and the triglyceride-glucose index, was associated with reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in adults undergoing health examinations. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1429 adults with complete core variables from an independent hospital-based cohort established at the Health Examination Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University between June 2024 and December 2025. CTI was calculated as TyG + 0.412 × ln [hs-CRP (mg/L)], where TyG = ln [TG (mg/dL) × fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL)/2]. The primary outcome was single-occasion reduced eGFR, defined as <90 mL/min/1.73 m², and was not interpreted as chronic kidney disease. Multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic spline analysis, receiver operating characteristic analysis, subgroup analysis, variance inflation factor diagnostics, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: The mean (SD) age was 48.8 (11.3) years, 46.8% of participants were women, and 398 individuals (27.9%) had single-occasion reduced eGFR. The prevalence of reduced eGFR increased across CTI quartiles, from 12.8% in the lowest quartile to 45.7% in the highest quartile. After adjustment for demographic factors, lifestyle factors, cardiometabolic comorbidities, and uric acid, each 1-SD increment in CTI was associated with 45% higher odds of reduced eGFR (odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11-1.90). Compared with the lowest quartile, the highest quartile showed an OR of 2.11 (95% CI, 1.07-4.17), whereas the adjusted linear trend across quartiles was borderline (P for trend = .056). Only 1 participant (0.1%) had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²; using a stricter eGFR <75 mL/min/1.73 m² threshold yielded a directionally similar but borderline association (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.99-3.10). CTI discriminated reduced eGFR modestly but better than TyG, hs-CRP, and remnant cholesterol. Conclusions: In this health examination population, higher CTI was independently associated with a higher prevalence of single-occasion reduced eGFR. Because discrimination was modest and the design was cross-sectional, CTI should be interpreted as an adjunctive marker of metabolic-inflammatory burden rather than a diagnostic or predictive tool. Prospective validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.