ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2026
Beyond access: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in device use among youth with type 1 diabetes.
Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in medical device use among youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are well documented. Inequities in access can arise in the unequal prescription of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices. Once prescribed, challenges to device use can also create inequities, but less is known about racial and socioeconomic disparities in post-access challenges such as barriers to use at school. Using focus group data from three mixed-method studies of youth with T1D (N = 50) and their caregivers (N = 56), we compare the experiences of higher-income and majority White youth to lower-income and predominantly Latinx and Black youth. We find many similarities, along with two striking differences. First, lower-income and majority Latinx and Black youth express more fear and victimization from bullying at school, which can lead to device discontinuation. Second, these youth and their caregivers report few connections to other families managing T1D but many connections to those with T2D. This social network configuration promotes the typicality assumption that these youth have T2D, which carries significant stigma and limits diabetes-related social capital that might otherwise support device use. Overall, our findings extend health inequities research by identifying unique challenges faced by lower-income and majority Latinx and Black youth with T1D in utilizing medical innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.