ArticleChemical & biomedical imaging2026
Fast Image Segmentation Toward Automation of 3D Ice Printing.
Article in Chemical & biomedical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Freeform 3D ice printing is emerging as a promising additive manufacturing method with potential applications in engineering, medicine, science, and art. Printing ice at the micrometer-millimeter scale is a challenging, high-frequency additive manufacturing process. Freeform ice 3D printing though is an early stage manufacturing process where complex geometries require significant time to design manually through an empirical trial-and-error approach, due to the nonlinear nature of droplet deposition and solidification along with unavoidable uncertainties and noise. This process would be tremendously improved with better understanding and harnessing the ability to visualize, analyze and adjust the printing process in real time. For this automation, using approaches such as closed loop control that have allowed tremendous advances in other fields like self-driving cars, plane autopilot, etc. would be very useful. In order to use closed loop control for this process, ice position and shape must be determined and transformed into in situ actionable data, which is complicated further by the transparency of ice and speed required for the phase transition from water to ice. We implemented vision techniques to build a data set to train a machine learning algorithm though an ice segmentation approach using a convolutional filter. We also implemented a hybrid optical flow algorithm (Farneback-FAST) to create a segmented video frame data set for training a neural network, Icenet. This approach was faster than the Farneback-FAST, segmenting frames in 25 ms, which allows for single and low multi droplet control. Our approaches will enable future closed loop control of the printing process and will be useful in a variety of areas including additive manufacturing, organ on a chip systems, and biomanufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.