ReviewOncology research2026
Preclinical Models of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: Therapeutic Evaluation and Translational Implications.
Review in Oncology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diverse DTPA-chelated lanthanides with relevance for nuclear medicine bound to an engineered lipocalin reveal conserved ligand geometry.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with clinical outcomes limited by biological heterogeneity and inconsistent therapeutic responses. Despite advances in systemic chemotherapy, targeted agents, immunotherapy, and liver-directed interventions, the translation of preclinical efficacy into clinical benefit remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for predictive experimental models. However, therapeutic efficacy in CRLM is highly model-dependent, and discrepancies between preclinical findings and clinical outcomes often arise from differences in biological fidelity across experimental platforms. This review critically examines preclinical platforms used to study CRLM, with emphasis on orthotopic and metastatic models that recapitulate hepatic colonization, tumor-microenvironment interactions, and immune regulation. We evaluate methodological innovations that enhance anatomical fidelity and reproducibility, including tissue adhesive-based implantation and biomaterial-assisted strategies. Importantly, we analyze how different models influence therapeutic assessment across systemic, immune-based, metabolic, and liver-directed treatments, and discuss their ability to predict clinical responses. By integrating insights from experimental studies with key clinical evidence, we delineate the strengths and limitations of current platforms and propose principles for rational model selection to improve translational success in CRLM research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.