Evidence mapPaperPMID 42359068Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting 5-year recurrence in breast cancer.

Shaoda Meng, Sicheng Liu, Minghua Lai, Li Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shaoda MengDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Sicheng LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Minghua LaiDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Li LiDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate prediction of breast cancer recurrence is vital for optimizing adjuvant therapy intensity. However, the traditional TNM staging system often lacks precision in capturing individual risk due to biological heterogeneity. This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning model to refine risk stratification. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 578 breast cancer patients with a median follow-up duration of 62 months. The cohort was randomly partitioned into a training set ( Results: In the internal validation cohort, the XGBoost model demonstrated superior discriminative performance with an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.835-0.918), significantly outperforming logistic regression (AUC = 0.693, 95% CI: 0.612-0.768) and the standard TNM system. SHAP analysis identified the Ki-67 index and positive lymph nodes as the most influential predictors, revealing non-linear risk associations. Crucially, the model successfully stratified patients within TNM Stages II and III into distinct high- and low-risk trajectories (Log-rank Conclusion: The proposed XGBoost-based framework provides a robust and interpretable tool for predicting 5-year recurrence, offering superior prognostic accuracy over standard anatomical staging. This approach holds promise for facilitating personalized clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

breast cancermachine learningrecurrence predictionSHAPXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42359068
PMCPMC13290535

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.